| To: | William Staten <William_Staten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:47:08 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OF46C1D315.1830CBD6-ON85257F55.0003D3CE-85257F55.00040FD8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF1B9DD255.E1F86B08-ON85257F54.004E7C3F-85257F54.005054A1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <136347470.19757537.1455053473332.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <OF46C1D315.1830CBD6-ON85257F55.0003D3CE-85257F55.00040FD8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | /qpEPuTrzkAchGCKBP50UHFJn/SA8Q== |
| Thread-topic: | Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used |
----- Original Message ----- > Nathan, > > Thanks I will look into this. Any reason why this is done from the disk.dm. > metrics but not the filesys. metrics? > Good question :) No real reason there were not separated out AFAICT - Mark, thoughts? Memories from way back then? cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used, William_Staten |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used, William_Staten |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Queston about pcp performance metrics filesys.used, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |