| To: | Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Dec 2014 04:19:48 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <548897F5.4010905@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5481E4D7.8050700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <991616924.12928901.1418084187235.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54876B8F.2050106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <428025601.13619915.1418163615228.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <548897F5.4010905@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | zuXYiuHeOpUMa2vSQ/lneFAgVjgPiA== |
| Thread-topic: | Dynamic metric rework |
----- Original Message ----- > Nathan, > OK, you can grab this commit on top of the previous one. Looks good to me. > [...] > My guess is that there should be some sort of low level qa test for > this, but I'm not sure what it would do. Fine-grained control over the PDUs sent toward a PMDA can be achieved with dbpmda if you're interested in taking an approach like that? See the work Lukas has been doing over in qa/967 for an example. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates: dynamic metrics, pmdapapi, containers, qa, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates: build, pmdapapi, qa, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Martins Innus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Martins Innus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |