Hi guys,
----- Original Message -----
> I think it may be time we had a qa conf call, if at least to
> agree on who's looking at the remaining failures so we don't
> double up, and to figure out if the release schedule needs
> another tweak. Nathan?
Good idea. Other than Lukas, this releases QA effort is being
largely carried out in our timezone - so perhaps if the three
of us have a quick call on this today and I'll represent where
Lukas is up to if I can get hold of him. I see David also has
some qa/1052 changes (possibly overlapping Kens?) & doc updates,
and there's a man page update pending on github - I'll review
& pull those in this morning.
(If you guys lemme know a time that suits you, I'll be there.)
I'm planning on focussing on the 1080 (valgrind vs atop) cases,
1079 (lvm vs atop) and fixing a pmlogger/pmdaproc.sh chkconfig
regression today (with associated qa/279 + new test work).
Lukas and I have been working on a long-standing qa/491 failure
(pmdaCache) on non-x86_64 platforms for a while now ... but its
really obscure and we remain none the wiser at this stage. On-
going.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|