Hopefully short-lived QA issue

To:	Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Hopefully short-lived QA issue
From:	Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:43:45 -0500 (EST)
Cc:	PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to:	pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<2029497109.4024932.1423716016512.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index:	ACkn+vTCsQGYp0fOw7e8PNFvsNv5Pg==
Thread-topic:	Hopefully short-lived QA issue

Hi guys,

Just a heads-up that I've committed a reproducer for
an s390x-specific /proc/cpuinfo parsing bug.  Until I
or someone else :) fixes it - which I expect will be
within a day or two - it'll cause qa/885 to fail.

(commit c99bdae10)

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Hopefully short-lived QA issue, Nathan Scott <=

Previous by Date:	pcp updates: coverity, qa, martins+fche merges, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:	pcp updates, Ken McDonell
Previous by Thread:	pcp updates: coverity, qa, martins+fche merges, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:	Possible QA issue in _valgrind_clean_assert, Nathan Scott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]