pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] sginap bug fix and regression test

To: Michael Newton <kimbrr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sginap bug fix and regression test
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:02:16 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1173241356.5051.50.camel@edge>
Organization: Aconex
References: <1173241356.5051.50.camel@edge>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:22 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ...
> Over time, all sginap/sleep/usleep calls should probably be phased out
> in preference for nanosleep(3) - I've only tackled pmie and pmval with
> this patch though.

I missed a quilt refresh on the pmval part - here's the latest version
(other woulda had some harmless gcc warnings about unused vars/funcs, I
think).  You may also see some patch offset wierdness when applying the
pmval chunk, because I have several other changes in that file in other
patches not yet sent.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

Attachment: use-nanosleep-not-sginap
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>