----- "Nathan Scott" <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ----- "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if what I've done with cpan/PMDA is kosher or not -
> > Nathan, have you had any experience of using this module in the
> > situation where the perl has been compiled with a different
> compiler
> > from the PMDA.so? On OpenSolaris perl is compiled with SunStudio's
> > compiler and I'm using gcc to compile PCP.
>
> I don't have any experience with that no, on the other platforms
> I've tried this on (Linux, Windows, Mac OS X) we're always using
> the same compiler.
>
> What was the reason for using gcc on OpenSolaris? If core bits like
> Perl are compiled with the Sun compiler, shouldn't PCP be compiled
> with that too? (wasn't the original port done with that compiler?).
> I dunno, wasn't me.
>
> Also, OOC:
> - how difficult is the packaging side of things on OpenSolaris?
> - whats the status of Qt4 on OpenSolaris?
>From a quick google search, I'm guessing that KDE (and hence
probably Qt) on OpenSolaris is built with the Sun compilers.
So, it would seem to be wise to stick with those...? There
even seemed to be some hints at aversion to gcc-only binaries
in OpenSolaris, from some of the docs I came across. *shrug*
Most of your changes (except builddefs) seem to be independent
of compiler used, so I think I'll just pull 'em all in for the
next point release and you can follow up on the compiler issue
later.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|