Hi Ken,
----- Original Message -----
> From my QA Farm ...
>
> Executive Summary: 21108 run, 95 failed (0.45%)
Looking good - thanks to everyone who's been working on getting this
number down! (special thanks to Lukas for a big effort the last few
releases incl. behind the scenes with the RHEL testing folks).
> 850: -a option problem, failing everywhere, fix under review
> [21 failures]
We're expecting this to pass everywhere now - have checked py2+3 here.
> 975: qa comparison logic is not fuzzy enough, code is probably OK
> [9 failures]
*nod* - I did make some initial tweaks here, but too conservative
it seems. Its sensitive to non-QA activity on the test machine.
> 196: has become unstable, probably due to changes in default pmlogger
> config and the broken pmcd this test uses ... needs test
> reengineering
> [6 failures]
>
> 662: Python differences between platforms make this a challenge ...
> the only option seems to be to expand the perimeter of the
> older Python versions where tests like this are notrun
> [6 failures]
>
> 957: network.softnet induced failure (metric not supported), fixed in
> qa test, but has not yet worked its way across the farm
> [3 failures]
Ah, sorry - I missed this one during earlier commits in this vein.
> 964: multiple failure modes, not diagnosis as yet
> [3 failures]
>
> And then it is the normal noise of onsies and twosies.
>
cheers.
--
Nathan
|