| To: | "'Mark Goodwin'" <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'pcp'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [pcp] log import needs ability to write mark records? |
| From: | "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:44:13 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56C7B690.4070308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56C691E0.4050808@xxxxxxxxxx> <00ca01d16ae0$3d9ea240$b8dbe6c0$@internode.on.net> <56C7B690.4070308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQHvyfb6m+pdJzgsqjl3bflfMPSsSQKWWfG5AoWjZ1Sezp0OsA== |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Goodwin [mailto:mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2016 11:43 AM > To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'pcp' <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [pcp] log import needs ability to write mark records? > > ... > So the options here are to either take the patch and extend > libpcp_import, or to rip out the multiple-input-file support in > collectl2pcp, and instead rely on pmlogmerge. Seems to me there are > legit uses for pmiPutMark(), so I'd rather go with the patch. > Thoughts? My vote is to patch away! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] support for elasticsearch 2 metrics, Alec Ten Harmsel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [pcp] support for elasticsearch 2 metrics, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] log import needs ability to write mark records?, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] log import needs ability to write mark records?, Dave Brolley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |