pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] question on rpm builds

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] question on rpm builds
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:03:41 +1100
Cc: "'PCP'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1369369635.22132330.1455872035063.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56C548F7.5020900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1436029232.21802619.1455770764295.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <015901d16af2$7ddefa50$799ceef0$@internode.on.net> <1369369635.22132330.1455872035063.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQHgON/4dwqgIEjqs/i0ynCqOizFCgHh6DLqArQ78lUB/sn0Vp7gzxgg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 7:54 PM
> To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [pcp] question on rpm builds
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> > Is there any reason why we should not simply kill this bit of the
> script?
> >
> 
> I can't see any, but we'll soon find out - see commit 81573ccc81.

Missed that commit email, sorry.

Just checked ... and of the ones I've tried since that commit was merged into 
my tree, the rpm warnings have gone away in 1 of 1 test cases (where 100% of 
the tests passed) ... so that's encouraging.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>