| To: | "'Frank Ch. Eigler'" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Regression in qa/628 |
| From: | "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:55:07 +1100 |
| Cc: | <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <y0mk31xj28z.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1224656795.6945862.1417136806064.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <8149026.6994945.1417145442845.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <6c1905a6-237d-4181-b2f5-d436d42f66b8.maildroid@localhost> <1867879926.7608473.1417393457721.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <1641491119.9465653.1417602588298.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5489FFCE.9050301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0mk31xj28z.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQIRiB/9PV2iKW4o7koVxDDLl0uvGgI+dLXlAOhFL58CsiKOugG25ryUAmfgEJcAoNwqOJu4cYgw |
Not so W, Frank. The PMDA rebuild does use the installed headers, but there is no header dependency here as the thing that changed is not referenced in any way by the PMDA code. This is just a teaser ... I have the real answer, details in a subsequent mail. > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:fche@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, 12 December 2014 8:39 AM > To: Ken McDonell > Subject: Re: Regression in qa/628 > > > > [...] And finally on to qa/628 ... this one _rebuilds_ the PMDA from > > source so seems to be immune from any e_ext_t changes. > > Just a WAG, but when it rebuilds the PMDA, does it do so against the system > pcp sources somehow, or against the development-tree ones? > > - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] RFC pcp update: pmParseUnitsStr() function, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Dynamic metric rework, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Regression in qa/628, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: packaging, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |