| To: | "'Frank Ch. Eigler'" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: pmRegisterDerived return values |
| From: | "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:18:06 +1100 |
| Cc: | "'Marko Myllynen'" <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <y0mio2nzofj.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <569CB025.4070603@xxxxxxxxxx> <569CB7C5.7030803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305297915.11201184.1453261568406.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mio2nzofj.fsf@xxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQIHi+15HIXLtpebrkfAOJtsaFEj0AIkYFWzAnUHQ94CYp53KZ5g61Sw |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:fche@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2016 12:55 PM > To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ken McDonell > <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: pmRegisterDerived return values > ... > Could the error message go into the __pmContext structure instead? Probably not ... pmRegisterDerived() can be (and most often is) called prior to any PMAPI context being created ... which is why it is thread-private in the current implementation. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmRegisterDerived return values, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pmRegisterDerived return values, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmRegisterDerived return values, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmRegisterDerived return values, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |