pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: pmRegisterDerived return values

To: "'Frank Ch. Eigler'" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: pmRegisterDerived return values
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:18:06 +1100
Cc: "'Marko Myllynen'" <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>, <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0mio2nzofj.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <569CB025.4070603@xxxxxxxxxx> <569CB7C5.7030803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305297915.11201184.1453261568406.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mio2nzofj.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQIHi+15HIXLtpebrkfAOJtsaFEj0AIkYFWzAnUHQ94CYp53KZ5g61Sw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:fche@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 January 2016 12:55 PM
> To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ken McDonell
> <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: pmRegisterDerived return values
> ...
> Could the error message go into the __pmContext structure instead?

Probably not ... pmRegisterDerived() can be (and most often is) called prior
to any PMAPI context being created ... which is why it is thread-private in
the current implementation.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>