| To: | "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [patch] speed pmie startup |
| From: | "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:23:49 +1000 |
| Cc: | "'Lukas Berk'" <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'pcp developers'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1623245265.5889251.1429840298981.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <852862416.3748569.1429589380945.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5536CD81.1070008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <670202791.5237429.1429755448032.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55385C8A.40403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <614087554.5255330.1429763218272.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55398121.8020608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1623245265.5889251.1429840298981.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQJFVXwLsV3iCBx4hVXCmAZtyeSboQGG411QAZnZ8xoB0/RJkALXzhx2AbByVVwBmJEcUZwZNUnQ |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, 24 April 2015 11:52 AM > ... > In all my tests, the values were only ever going down (slightly), so I only > went > with only decreasing the filter range. OK ... your analysis trumps my wild arse guess. > That may be because I aggressively reduced the timeout in test qa/312 - too > much so perhaps. Does this change things...? split the difference (sort of) ... pmsleep 1 seems to work for me ... do you wanna commit that, or should I? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Hotproc fixes, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] speed pmie startup, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |