pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Small pmie QA issue (was Re: [pcp] patch pings)

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Frank Ch. Eigler'" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Small pmie QA issue (was Re: [pcp] patch pings)
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:02:56 +1100
Cc: "'pcp developers'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:
References: <20151001203810.GB7968@xxxxxxxxxx> <5616C970.8020306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151008205738.GB12082@xxxxxxxxxx> <1889384961.51637941.1444362897341.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQM7xYv19TC376b+bfo/rcjtyX/R6gJ7c9yhAl3LqJwCBdj0SwLK42fem0AYBDA=
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken McDonell [mailto:kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 9 October 2015 9:00 PM
> ...
> Absolutely related ... qa/294 was not in the pmie group, that's why it
> was missed.

grr ... :g/294/s//295/g in my last reply ... then it makes more sense.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>