pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [pcp] pcp QA status

To: "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dave Brolley'" <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pcp] pcp QA status
From: "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:00:49 +1000
Cc: <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2045474289.1477927.1466734119976.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5767A046.3030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <683173640.795045.1466575709412.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <196795449.1180629.1466661414760.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <576C31F0.8080305@xxxxxxxxxx> <2045474289.1477927.1466734119976.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQFnLnc8h+koVAVkWI++LBthxhybJQF8y27CApNsZ1YBPyMFpwH3L9PsoJQec0A=
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, 24 June 2016 12:09 PM
> ...
> Ken, is it always non-secure-sockets builds that fail with your QA
> hosts?
> (pmconfig  -L secure_sockets)

For me 651 is failing on

vm01 PCP 3.11.4   i686    Ubuntu 15.10 (wily)
        secure_sockets=true

vm23 PCP 3.11.4   i686    Fedora 20 (Heisenbug)
        secure_sockets=true

vm25 PCP 3.11.3   x86_64  CentOS 5.11 (Final)
        secure_sockets=true

vm28 PCP 3.11.4   x86_64  RHEL Server 6.8 (Santiago)
        secure_sockets=true

So secure sockets or not are out of the frame it would appear.

qa/651 discards pmproxy.log ... fixed that

pmproxy does not open log file early enough so running pmproxy -Dcontext leaks 
diags into .out file ... fixed that

qa/651 had wrong (looking) logic testing id pcp, then running pmproxy with -U 
myusername ... changed to -U pcp

And it passes everywhere for me.

I'll leave it to someone who knows to explain this.

All these changes are my latest round of commits.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>