| To: | "'Nathan Scott'" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [pcp] qa/767 failing most places |
| From: | "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:33:28 +1100 |
| Cc: | "'PCP'" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1281616127.13879459.1424735391627.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <54EB8B14.7070605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1281616127.13879459.1424735391627.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AQHch2CjyImo8TZUu0YU/mQFSoNSUwJAQuapnNSBxZA= |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Scott [mailto:nathans@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2015 10:50 AM > .... Ohhhhh... part of it is > going to be a lack of kernel support for setns(2) - I'll need to get some way > to detect that built into the QA test. Check qa 377 or 480 for a (hacky) way to check in a qa script HAVE_SOMETHING that maybe set by configure during the build. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [pcp] qa/767 failing most places, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] qa/767 failing most places, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [pcp] qa/767 failing most places, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] qa/767 failing most places, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |