| To: | Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?) |
| From: | Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2005 05:08:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | erikj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pagg@xxxxxxxxxxx, limin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lse-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, guillaume.thouvenin@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41FA330A.2030303@ak.jp.nec.com> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <Pine.SGI.4.53.0501181437280.627920@subway.americas.sgi.com> <41F8E117.5030501@ak.jp.nec.com> <20050127081753.5a9d16af.pj@sgi.com> <41FA330A.2030303@ak.jp.nec.com> |
| Sender: | pagg-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Thank-you for your informative response.
Kaigai wrote:
> But what I really wanted is a Common fork()/exit() event handling framework.
Could you expand on this a bit? Especially since you acknowledge that loadable
modules are not particularly essential to your work, I am curious as to what
else you find valuable in such a fork/exit framework.
> it will make to restrain the unregulated hook functions in fork()/exit().
I will confess to not quite making sense of this statement - sorry.
Thanks for your reply so far.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?), Kaigai Kohei |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?), Guillaume Thouvenin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?), Kaigai Kohei |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CpuSet on PAGG (Re: PAGG in Open Source projects?), Kaigai Kohei |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |