| To: | ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ogl-sample] Question regarding ATI extensions |
| From: | "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:43:03 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020321010959.B19046@oddhack.engr.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20020318163254.GA17413@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <20020321010959.B19046@oddhack.engr.sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-ogl-sample@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.27i |
>> Jon Leech <ljp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As mentioned in my previous email - the core 1.3+ and most extension > enums are not currently supported in the SI codebase, so they are > commented out in enum.spec and found in enumext.spec instead. Yes, I'm sorry, I figured that out after sending my email and forgot to send a follow up. > I've just never had any reason to think about it because enum.spec is > not being used for input to any processing tool that we use, it's > just a document. Oh, thanks for the info. Marcelo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ogl-sample] Parameter semantics in .spec files, Jon Leech |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ogl-sample] doc/registry/specs/enum.spec, bug, Sven Panne |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ogl-sample] Question regarding ATI extensions, Jon Leech |
| Next by Thread: | [ogl-sample] Parameter semantics in .spec files, Sven Panne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |