| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses |
| From: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:41:52 +0900 |
| Cc: | dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com> |
| Organization: | Keio University |
| References: | <20021009234421.J29133@edinburgh.cisco.com> <20021009.161414.63434223.davem@redhat.com> <20021010002902.A3803@edi-view1.cisco.com> <20021009.162438.82081593.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (Kashiharajingū-mae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-*-nt5.1.2600) MULE/4.1 (AOI) Meadow/1.15pre1-IPv6 (SHOUBU:63) |
At Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:24:38 -0700 (PDT), ++ David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour > when more than one behaviour is acceptable. > > Great, that's what I was trying to find out. > > Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case > is one such issue. :-) No, there is no test item in TAHI test that supposes link-local prefix is /64 :-) The reason we change the prefix length from /10 to /64 is following spec and adapting other imprementations. -- Yuji Sekiya |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |