| To: | misiek@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses |
| From: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:55:53 +0900 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | In your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:08:39 +0100" <20000222130839.A26768@admin.misiek.eu.org> |
| Organization: | Information Sciences Institute |
| References: | <20000222130839.A26768@admin.misiek.eu.org> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.11 (Euglena viridis) CLIME/1.13.6 (中ノ庄) MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta19) (Shinjuku) (i586-pc-linux) |
>>>>> In <20000222130839.A26768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello, > IMHO simplest way for Linux to allow getting ipv6 addresses > via this ioctl but don't break old application is: > ioctl(AF_INET6 socket, ...) - return IPv6 addresses only or > both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. > ioctl(AF_INET socket, ...) - return only ipv4 addresses (this > same result as when using current > Linux kernel) KAME people propose new function called getifaddrs(3). BSDI4 has it already to get local IPv6 addresses. I noticed that SIOCFIGCONF doesn't return IPv6 addresses and thinked of it. But I have no idea. What do you think about it, Alexey ? --- SEKIYA Yuji USC/ISI Computer Networks Division 7 <sekiya@xxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx / sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |