| To: | "Paul Albrecht" <palbrecht@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Jul 2003 23:48:10 +0200 |
| Cc: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <001401c344df$ccbc63c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel> |
| References: | <3F08858E.8000907@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <001a01c3441c$6fe111a0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3F08B7E2.7040208@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <000d01c3444f$e6439600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3F090A4F.10004@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <001401c344df$ccbc63c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
"Paul Albrecht" <palbrecht@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This statement is inconsistent with the description of this scenario in > Steven's TCP/IP Illustrated. Specifically, continuing the handshake in the > TCP layer, i.e., sending a syn/ack and moving to the syn_recd state, is > incorrect if the limit of the server's socket backlog would be exceeded. > How do you account for this discrepancy between linux and other > berkeley-derived implementations? The 4.4BSD-Lite code described in Stevens is long outdated. All modern BSDs (and probably most other Unixes too) do it in a similar way to what Nivedita described. The keywords are "syn flood attack" and "DoS". -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Paul Albrecht |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Doug McNaught |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Paul Albrecht |
| Next by Thread: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Doug McNaught |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |