| To: | Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PPP over X |
| From: | Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Feb 2000 20:36:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Mark Spencer's message of "Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:28:42 -0600 (EST)" |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002061210100.14576-100000@marko.marko.net> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Spencer <markster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Mark> p.s. Would you like me to setup a mailing list for this?
Mark> I've got majordomo and it wouldn't take me but a few minutes
Mark> to do so.
I'd prefer to keep the discussion on this list. ppp-over-X design
is strongly related to the linux network design. And that's
exactly what netdev is for.
It's also very important (you know, the peer review issue)
that linux network experts can observe the
discussion even if they (currently) don't participate.
Although there is sufficient documentation availabe which allows
for writing a standard (e.g. ethernet) network driver, there is
almost no documentation of the linux network core.
Experience shows that there are several traps where people step in when
trying to program stuff not addressed by the network driver documentation.
Henner
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Henner Eisen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Mitchell Blank Jr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: PPP over X, Paul Mackerras |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |