| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Non-fragmented ICMPv6 packets with an IPv6 fragment header |
| From: | "Richard Jørgensen" <ric@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 26 Apr 2000 11:02:08 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru's message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:29:26 +0400 (MSK DST)" |
| References: | <200004191829.WAA07126@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Reply-to: | ric@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.3 |
> > Linux IPv6 stack seems to have a problem receiving ICMP6 packets, if > > the IPv6 packet contain a fragment header, but is not fragmentet > > (i.e. the entire packet is in _one_ fragment. > > Yes... They are never "reassembled". Thank you, it will be fixed soon. Great! > > It seems only to be a problem with ICMP6 - having an "unused" fragment > > header in a TCP-packet does not seem to give any problems. > > It is impossible. Please, check this more creafully. > Probably, it indicates some another bug. Sorry, that was me. TCP-packets also newer get "reassembled". I used telnet(1) to generate the TCP packets and didn't nottice that telnet set the "don't fragment" bit - in which case the fragment header is not added by the NAT-PT translation. /ric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Move shaper control information into skb->cb, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Increased DoS protection., Rusty Russell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Non-fragmented ICMPv6 packets with an IPv6 fragment header, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PPPOE Was (Re: >=pre5 OOPS on boot failure to open /dev/console, Henner Eisen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |