netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
From: Jan Rychter <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:42:36 -0700
Cc: linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030712222222.01089864.davem@redhat.com> (David S. Miller's message of "Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:22:22 -0700")
References: <1056755336.5459.16.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030627.172123.78713883.davem@redhat.com> <1056827972.6295.28.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030628.150328.74739742.davem@redhat.com> <m2vfu765cx.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com> <20030712222222.01089864.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux)
>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
 David> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:07:42 -0700
 David> Jan Rychter <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 >> Interesting you should think you're 'rewarding' people. I thought
 >> your goal was to have fun working on cool software and making it
 >> better. I also thought I had the same goal as a bug-reporter.
 >>
 >> When I write software, I care about every bug report and consider
 >> people doing the reporting a very valuable resource.

 David> The whole game changes when you are stretched as thinly as I am.
 David> Scaling becomes everything, and nitpicking through vague and
 David> poorly composed bug reports is an absolute waste of my time as
 David> networking subsystem maintainer.
[...]

Couldn't agree more. Especially after having benefited from your code so
much (starting back in the early sparc days...).

 David> Having me pillage through a bug database is a poor use of my
 David> time and capabilities.  And all of my time is spent reviewing
 David> patches and dealing with the properly composed bug reports
 David> anyways, so even if I enjoyed pillaging through badly made bug
 David> reports I couldn't.

 David> People are assuming that just because _I_ don't want to work on
 David> the bad bug reports that I think nobody should.  It's the exact
 David> opposite.
[...]

Thanks for this explanation -- I responded because I was worried you
were convincing people that it's a good thing if bug reports get
dropped, because the really important ones will float to the top anyway.

--J.

Attachment: pgpCL6l2e5NH2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>