| To: | Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: skb allocation problems |
| From: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:47:18 +1000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 09 Apr 2001 19:03:46 +0300." <2D6CADE9B0C6D411A27500508BB3CBD063CF07@eseis15nok> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <2D6CADE9B0C6D411A27500508BB3CBD063CF07@eseis15nok> you write: > > PRE_R: old skb:c371ee40 new skb:c371ee30 > <7>NAT: 3 dropping untracked packet c350fa00 1 192.168.102.22 -> > 192.168.102.29 Try poisoning the packet in __kfree_skb() (or skb_headerinit()): skb->head = skb->data = skb->tail = skb->end = NULL; This will catch almost anyone using a freed packet, and you'll get a OOPS in the right place. Hope that helps, Rusty. -- Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Olympic Updated, mike_phillips |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | mroute.h patch, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: skb allocation problems, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: skb allocation problems, Imran . Patel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |