| To: | linux@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:29:28 +0100 |
| Cc: | arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bunk@xxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050131232735.11236.qmail@science.horizon.com> (linux@horizon.com's message of "31 Jan 2005 23:27:35 -0000") |
| References: | <20050131201141.GA4879@elte.hu> <20050131232735.11236.qmail@science.horizon.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
linux@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > (The homebrew 15-bit block cipher in this code does show how much the > world needs a small block cipher for some of these applications.) Doesn't TEA fill this niche? It's certainly used for this in the Linux kernel, e.g. in reiserfs (although I have my doubts it is really useful there) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Dan Siemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, linux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |