| To: | Noah Romer <klevin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New net features for added performance |
| From: | Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Mar 2001 00:32:25 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Knernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Noah Romer's message of "Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:38:12 -0800 (PST)" |
| References: | <Pine.SUN.3.96.1010224182145.11813A-100000@eskimo.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "Noah" == Noah Romer <klevin@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Noah> In my experience, Tx interrupt mitigation is of little Noah> benefit. I actually saw a performance increase of ~20% when I Noah> turned off Tx interrupt mitigation in my driver (could have been Noah> poor implementation on my part). You need to define performance increase here. TX interrupt coalescing can still be a win in the systems load department. Jes |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.2.19pre16 TCP problems, Mario Lorenz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New net features for added performance, Jes Sorensen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New net features for added performance, Jes Sorensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |