| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx |
| From: | Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 18 Dec 2000 21:27:37 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru's message of "Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:30:31 +0300 (MSK)" |
| References: | <200012181930.WAA32333@ms2.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "kuznet" == kuznet <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: kuznet> Hello! >> The problem is that some cards like the Tulip and Starfire don't >> allow misaligned DMA. kuznet> Aligned dma can be always used and, if protocol happens to be kuznet> ethernet II, headers can be copied for faulty kuznet> architectures. Actually, I am even not sure that misaligned kuznet> accesses for intel are better than copy. This still requires that the card can DMA to multiple buffers, or are you suggesting to copy out the header no matter what? Jes |
| Previous by Date: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |