netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Jun 2000 17:31:40 +0200
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Gleb Natapov's message of "Sun, 11 Jun 2000 06:35:46 +0000"
References: <Pine.OSF.3.96-heb-2.07.1000610174812.19185A-100000@tochna.technion.ac.il> <d3og58ewmh.fsf@lxplus007.cern.ch> <39433342.4A9E80CC@nbase.co.il>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4
>>>>> "Gleb" == Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Gleb> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>  You mean all the ones that are practically unused (and the used
>> ones which should never have been used in the first place: IPX +
>> AppleTalk).

Gleb> IPV6 and IPX unused?!! Perhaps we should remove all these
Gleb> protocols from source tree :)

IPv6 is practically unused, IPX and AppleTalk are in use a lot
but thats very *unfortunate* since they are completely broken.

Jes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>