| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:23:55 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050604045119.GA25270@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Herbert Xu wrote: > Thanks James. What do you think about eating up 32 bytes on the > stack in esp_input/esp_output? Sounds like a low price to pay, given the general overhead of ipsec. > In fact, how did we come up with the number of four frags? Why wouldn't > say two frags do for most users or perhaps even one? I don't know where that came from. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Automated linux kernel testing results, Jonathan Day |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ieee80211: Update generic definitions to latest specs., Jouni Malinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Replace scatterlist with crypto_frag, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |