| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 May 2005 13:09:44 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx, <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050519095334.018dd674.akpm@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > How come? It seems sensible to have library code which consoldates the > common netlink setup and teardown stuff and which offers a higher-level > messaging API, although connector may be a bit overdesigned for that. The > fork connector guys seemed to find it useful? I don't think it's the right implementation, and providing feedback on it has proven frustrating and unfruitful. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Rick Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip), Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |