| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: pskb_expand_head instead of skb_copy in skb_checksum_help |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:53:16 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040824115541.52955b2a.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:05:32 +1000 > Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The idea is simple. None of the callers of skb_checksum are passing it > > skb's which are shared. They may be cloned however. But the application > > checksum is always in the skb header so there is no need to linearise it. > > What about looping back of multicast packets via netif_rx(), > is that handled correctly too? They are clones. I can easily regression test it if needed. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC/PATCH] Convert architecture dependent rtnetlink attribute to fixed sized ones, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | DHCP and keventd, Andy Fleming |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: pskb_expand_head instead of skb_copy in skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: pskb_expand_head instead of skb_copy in skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |