| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipsec, nat-t, iproute2? |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:19 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040730170726.GA5144@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, bert hubert wrote: > 1) One can configure ipsec over netlink (XFRM_USER), is this the preferred > interface? Is it documented somehwere, or is there some source which uses > this interface? Alternatively, is PFKEY considered deprecated? PF_KEY is not deprecated, it's an IETF standard and required for compliance & compatibility. XFRM_USER is simply the native Linux interface. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gigabit trouble, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipsec, nat-t, iproute2?, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | (udp-en/decap broken in 2.6.8-rc2?) Re: ipsec, nat-t, iproute2?, bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |