| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPCOMP scratch buffer (was: [Openswan dev] IPComp) |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:03:21 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040709100213.GA12215@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Herbert Xu wrote: > > scratch buffer for each packet, based on the size of the packet. IPComp > > is very slow path, and allocating 64k for each SA is optimizing for an > > uncommon worst case in a way which will potentially eat up a lot of memory > > (e.g. > 6MB for 100 tunnels). > > What about a shared per-cpu buffer? > You can try if you like. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pskb change in dst->output, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ethernet QoS support?, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | IPCOMP scratch buffer (was: [Openswan dev] IPComp), Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Openswan dev] IPComp, Dominique Blas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |