| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec and Path MTU |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:12:12 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040616121026.GA1169@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Herbert Xu wrote: > Now the problem with all this is that it looks pretty complicated. > So I'd like to hear from you that this is all unnecessary and that > one of you already has a solution for it all :) I think this sounds reasonable, and it is complicated (there's a reason why it hasn't been implemented yet). - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [2/9][PATCH 2.6] fix mc_filter on big-endian arch, Roger Luethi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec and Path MTU, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec and Path MTU, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec and Path MTU, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |