| To: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: your mail |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:46:11 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200404121623.42558.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > According to my measurements, > > ip_vs_control_add() (from include/net/ip_vs.h) is called twice > and > sock_queue_rcv_skb() (from include/net/sock.h) is called 19 times > from various kernel .c files. > > Both these includes generate more than 500 bytes of code on x86. > > These patches uninline them. Please apply. What kind of performance impact (if any) does this patch have? - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.6.4 e100 NAPI - dst cache overflow and network unavailability, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.5] pcnet32 fix hang/crash with loopback test, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | (no subject), Denis Vlasenko |
| Next by Thread: | rudimentary ISR question, Steve Modica |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |