| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:26:46 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040209121926.6f016ebf.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > RTCF_*NAT is dead wood, the existing route nating stuff is totally broken > an unusable in 2.6.x, the eventual plan was to code up XFRM engine version > of that feature but this is of course not done. Since nobody is complaining > about lack of routing NAT in 2.6.x, I think we should just kill off all > references > and if someone gets inspired they can code up the XFRM engine version. Sounds like a plan. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |