| To: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up |
| From: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:56:04 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031115212034.GA16326@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Does anybody see any problem with this simplification? Not for 2.6.0, of > course... No, looks like a good idea. Might be able to push address length verification up there too. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: af_packet & CHECKSUM_HW, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ibmtr -- convert to new probeing, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] moving the test for sockaddr->sa_family up, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |