On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > .... > Can you instead give a patch relative to Andrew's? His is > applied already and in fact pushed into Linus's tree. > Yes. It is in the attachment. -- Arthur
|
| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] preempt count regression w/ lockless loopback patch |
| From: | Arthur Kepner <akepner@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:46:07 -0700 |
| Cc: | akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxx, gillb4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040622123931.50d5ac05.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <200406210510.i5L5A340018849@hera.kernel.org> <20040621035702.6114bdbe.akpm@osdl.org> <Pine.SGI.4.56.0406220913010.1334066@neteng.engr.sgi.com> <20040622123931.50d5ac05.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David S. Miller wrote: > .... > Can you instead give a patch relative to Andrew's? His is > applied already and in fact pushed into Linus's tree. > Yes. It is in the attachment. -- Arthur
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] [sparse] get rid of warnings from 8139too driver, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [sparse] get rid of warnings about #if DEBUG, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] preempt count regression w/ lockless loopback patch, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] preempt count regression w/ lockless loopback patch, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
