three weeks ago we had a message exchang on nd_tbl not
being a public symbol; I had sent you some code for showing
the usage.
What do you think now?
best, christian.
---
Christian Tschudin, University of Basel http://cn.cs.unibas.ch/
Computer Science Dept, Bernoullistr. 16, CH - 4056 Basel, Switzerland
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Christian Tschudin wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:
>
> > Ok, but basically, we do not export it unless it is really used.
> > We may do if it is necessary when you merge it.
> >
> > BTW, for your purpose, we may export
> > ndisc_lookup()
> > or something instead of nd_tbl itself.
> >
> > Anyway, I'd like to know the usage (code).
>
> Your new ndisc_lookup() would need to distinguish the IP address types
> (relating to different tables).
>
> Here is roughly what we do:
>
> ---
> int netbox_neigh_map(struct net_device *dev,
> struct lunartarget_s *host,
> char *eth)
> {
> struct neighbour *neigh = 0;
>
> if (TARGET_IS_IPV4(host))
> neigh = neigh_lookup_errno(&arp_tbl, (struct
> in_addr*)&(host->addr.ipv4), dev);
> else if (TARGET_IS_IPV6(host))
> neigh = neigh_lookup_errno(&nd_tbl, &host->addr.ipv6, dev);
>
> if (!IS_ERR(neigh)) {
> neigh->parms->delay_probe_time = 0;
> NEIGH_UPDATE(neigh, eth, NUD_REACHABLE, 1, 0);
> neigh_release(neigh);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
> ---
>
> Our other function netbox_neigh_unmap() is basically the same,
> with the flag NUD_REACHABLE replaced by NUD_NONE.
>
> best, christian
>
> PS: full code (use guest/guest for username/password) at
> https://subversion.cs.unibas.ch/repos/lunar/trunk/lnx/knetbox.c
>
> >
> > --yoshfuji
> >
>
|