| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:50:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | "Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <42A4E599.2090604@candelatech.com> |
| References: | <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0450C00B@orsmsx408> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0506061647340.128@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <42A4E599.2090604@candelatech.com> |
| Replyto: | "Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Ben Greear wrote: So is the Linux server reading/writing these large files to/from the disk? no, the test runs completely from memory, and the clients are reading/writing from/to the server Can you tell us how much performance went down when you increased the descriptors to 512?
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Rick Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jesse Brandeburg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |