| To: | Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000 |
| From: | Christoph Lameter <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 14:15:55 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, shai@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <428AF378.5020109@cosmosbay.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505171854490.20408@graphe.net> <m1sm0l5lwa.fsf@muc.de> <428AF378.5020109@cosmosbay.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Related question, is pci_alloc_consistent() already NUMA aware ? Nope. It also ultimately acquires memory via vmalloc. pci_alloc_consistent will also need some rework to allocate memory consistent (well the name is coherent right?) with the node that the device is on. Second case of a need for a node aware vmalloc? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] e1000: NUMA aware allocation of descriptors V2, Christoph Lameter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NUMA aware allocation of transmit and receive buffers for e1000, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |