| To: | Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | "Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:48:34 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>, Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <B8561865DB141248943E2376D0E85215FFE1C8@DHOST001-17.DEX001.intermedia.net> |
| References: | <B8561865DB141248943E2376D0E85215FFE1C8@DHOST001-17.DEX001.intermedia.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
1st bug: Customer had the same 10.100.xx.xx/24 net that I had and my inter-system communication wouldn't work, because all my routes got screwed up. (i.e the SNMP sub-agents couldn't talk with the master). You say that a client will not allow you to use net 10. OK, but, the same client would not allow you to use 127/8 because they use it! What I'm saying is that 10.0.0.0/8 and 127.0.0.0/8 are the same. The customer can use them. You assume that the client will not use 127/8. Why? This is wrong. You can use it, the client can use it. --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel.umbrella.ro/ |
| Previous by Date: | netdev-2.6 queue updated, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), jamal |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Steve Iribarne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |