netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly

from [Pekka Savola] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:45:00 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, akepner@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m1zmut7l5q.fsf@muc.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505170914130.29021@linux.site> <20050517.104947.112621738.davem@davemloft.net> <m1zmut7l5q.fsf@muc.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: 
P.S.: Arthur I think your arguments would have more
force if you published the test program that demonstrates the
corruption.

If more explicit analytical or theoretical background would be convincing, look no further than http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-mathis-frag-harmful-00.txt

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Andi Kleen
Next by Date:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, Andi Kleen
Next by Thread:  Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]