| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:12:22 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Alex Aizman <itn780@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050331114122.GL24804@muc.de> |
| References: | <20050330161522.GH32111@g5.random> <20050331114122.GL24804@muc.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > It wont work - I can guarantee you that if you add a limit like > "we only support 8 iscsi connections max" then users/customers will raise > hell because it does not fit their networks. What would prevent the iscsi driver from telling the network stack to increase the size of the mempools when additional iscsi connections are configured ? -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [IPV4]: Exclude "All deletion of equal addresses only differing by prefix length.", Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |