| To: | Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h |
| From: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:34:56 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Ian Campbell <icampbell@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040316192247.A7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <1079369568.19012.100.camel@icampbell-debian> <20040316001141.C29594@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040316192247.A7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > What are your thoughts on this?
>
> So how do we solve this problem. Should I just merge this change and
> ask you to pull it? I think that's rather impolite though.
I didn't apply the patch because you said it was untested ;)
I'll happily remove that irq.h include if it really doesn't do anything
but break things. I'd feel happier about it if somebody said it has been
tested, though ;)
Linus
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netpoll warning in tulip, Matt Mackall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h, Russell King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |