| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Restrict local IP announcements in ARP requests |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:50:32 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040211201656.4e4f708e.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402081149001.6268@u.domain.uli> <20040209140853.69ab8bea.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402100049470.1251@u.domain.uli> <20040209151053.1f63937a.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402100251380.1251@u.domain.uli> <20040211201656.4e4f708e.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
> But I want the docs for the sysctl to talk about this. Something
> simple like:
>
> + 1 - Try to avoid local addresses that are not in the target's
> + subnet for this interface as far as we know. In some environments
> + subnets may be active that this system is not aware of, thus this
> + setting might cause problems in such cases.
>
> Tweak it however you wish, just get the idea/warning across.
>
> I'd also prefer if you at least lightly define what "best" source address
> means in the context of arp_announce==2.
I hope I explained them using my non-native english :)
May be the info is not good enough and can be improved. This is
against latest bk (there will be no conflict with the recently added
flag):
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/arp_announce-2.6.2-4.diff
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Restrict local IP announcements in ARP requests, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Restrict local IP announcements in ARP requests, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |