| To: | Erik Hensema <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory |
| From: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:30:21 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <slrnbvh1hd.jl6.erik@dexter.hensema.net> |
| References: | <slrnbvgohn.1pb.erik@dexter.hensema.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041257290.2162@home.osdl.org> <slrnbvh1hd.jl6.erik@dexter.hensema.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Erik Hensema wrote:
> Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >
> > Can you do /proc/slabinfo too?
>
> Sure, this is of course my currently running system, 4 days, 9:53
> uptime.
>
> slabinfo - version: 2.0
> # name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab>
> <pagesperslab> : tunables <batchcount> <limit> <sharedfactor> : slabdata
> <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail>
> tcp6_sock 19729 19732 1024 4 1 : tunables 54 27 0 :
> slabdata 4933 4933 0
You've got 19 _megabytes_ allocated to "tcp6_sock", and they are all
marked as "active". That's almost certainly the leaking bug.
Everything else looks reasonably normal.
> I do use IPv6. I've got three active tunnels and native IPv6 over
> ethernet.
Yeah, but there is no way you have 19 MB worth of sockets active for three
tunnels.
David?
Linus
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [e1000 2.6-exp] back out CSA interrupt fix, Feldman, Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: (usagi-core 16947) Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | [e1000 2.6-exp] back out CSA interrupt fix, Feldman, Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.0: something is leaking memory, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |