| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:58:47 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | "Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xerox@xxxxxxxxxx" <xerox@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <16102.9418.43884.336925@robur.slu.se> <20030610.115759.26513736.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101725020.17226@ns.istop.com> <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@redhat.com> |
| Reply-to: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx> > What's the do_gettimeofday for? > > Every packet records a timestamp. I'm not aware of anything in IP routing that requires a timestamp for every packet. To me it sounds like we could rip that out too. -Ralph |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |