netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check

To: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check
From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:26:20 -0500 (EST)
Cc: arun4linux <arun4linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20021214161446.B23020@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <200212141428.TAA32351@WS0005.indiatimes.com> <20021214161446.B23020@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Russell King wrote:
...
> Rubbish.
>
> Think about what you've just said.  Patch level version changes are
> things like 2.5.43 to 2.5.44 or 2.4.19 to 2.4.20.
>
> You are saying that we shouldn't change any interfaces between (eg)
> 2.5.43 and 2.5.44, but we should change every interface we want to
> change between 2.4.15 and 2.5.0.
        Put very simply yes .  x.odd-number.y IS for DEVELOPEMENT ,
        x.even-number.y IS for Stability .
        If people can not understand that I feel sorry for them .
                JimL
-- 
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>