| To: | Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check |
| From: | "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:26:20 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | arun4linux <arun4linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20021214161446.B23020@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <200212141428.TAA32351@WS0005.indiatimes.com> <20021214161446.B23020@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Russell King wrote:
...
> Rubbish.
>
> Think about what you've just said. Patch level version changes are
> things like 2.5.43 to 2.5.44 or 2.4.19 to 2.4.20.
>
> You are saying that we shouldn't change any interfaces between (eg)
> 2.5.43 and 2.5.44, but we should change every interface we want to
> change between 2.4.15 and 2.5.0.
Put very simply yes . x.odd-number.y IS for DEVELOPEMENT ,
x.even-number.y IS for Stability .
If people can not understand that I feel sorry for them .
JimL
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
| babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Russell King |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Steffen Persvold |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check, Steffen Persvold |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |