netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg()

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg()
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20041022.153137.99739029.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Reply-to: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Dave/Yoshifuji,
  I agree that the case you pointed out is tricky. I am fine with either 
EAFNOSUPPORT or EINVAL. But the POSIX and SUSv3 man pages specify EINVAL 
as a error only when the sum of iov_len values overflows ssize_t.

Thanks
Suresh

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:

>In article <20041022.153056.57690221.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 22 Oct 
>2004 15:30:56 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
><yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
>> This may be convered by EAFNOSUPPORT.
>              covered
>
>--yoshfuji
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>